Nike hires new CEO Elliot Hill to replace John Donahoe

Today, Nike, Inc. announced its replacement of much-criticized former CEO, John Donahoe, with Elliott Hill (pictured above.)

The move came mere days after Bloomberg published a devastating assessment of Donahoe’s tenure:  The Man Who Made Nike Uncool.  Instead of fulfilling fans’ desires to invest in R&D and fulfill the company’s golden era marketing aspirations as a high tech innovator, Donahoe’s reported approach more closely resembled that of a “fast fashion” brand: squeezing consumers, retailers, and workers alike to increase margins for decades-old models like the Nike Dunk.  Though earnings rose under Donahoe’s tenure, the company ultimately failed the “vibes test,” resulting in a widespread loss of confidence.  Earlier this year, share prices plummeted following projected revenue declines, due in no small part to sagging sales in North America, as the company’s missteps began to catch up with it.

Donahoe’s “direct to consumer” pivot ceded retail shelf space to rivals both new and old, allowing rivals like Hoka, ASICS, and On to gain visibility in Nike’s prized running category.  Sneaker collectors, long weary of jumping through hoops to pay ballooning prices for decrepit tech and unfaithful replicas of classic sneakers, increasingly shifted attention and allegiance to the likes of New Balance.  Repeated layoffs and the departure of key personnel eroded the company’s talent base.

Even Nike’s seemingly unassailable lead in basketball is now under threat.  Adidas’ first signature shoe for Anthony Edwards made waves following its launch earlier this year, and New Balance recently announced the addition of top prospect Cooper Flagg to its growing endorsement team.

Nike remains a dominant force in the industry, with a large and enviable roster of sponsored athletes, but the brand has lost some of its luster and identity.  Once marketed as a renegade, youthful underdog, Nike has since become the stagnant, establishment empire against which such underdogs rally.

Even as an overreliance on nostalgia contributed to the company’s recent stumbles, it again looked to the past when charting its path forward.  In its press release, Nike stressed incoming CEO Elliott Hill’s longtime connection to the company, perhaps sensing the need to draw a sharp contrast against an unpopular outbound executive with no prior footwear experience often caricaturized as operating out of his depth.

Is Elliott Hill the right choice for the moment?  Let us know in our forums.

 

(We may receive referral and affiliate commissions as a result of visits and purchases made through outbound links, which help support our community.)

Community Comments
Join the discussion →

Latest
Popular
moe200069
Supporter
24133
42057
Joined
May 15, 2005
703 hwy said:
Nike also messed up trying to make everything a variant Kobe model.

i tend to agree with this. and at the same time, the Sabrina 1s and 2s were really well done
2433
12790
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
fluid hips said:
Peeped alot of silver Asics this weekend in NYC

Great thread.

But man….these are wild. These were essentially one of two shoes (basic NBs being the other) issued at basic training. Never thought I’d see the day.
41962
43592
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
pmatic said:
These companies are going to learn about these "store bought" CEOs. They're just there for the title and the money.
22074
16294
Joined
May 25, 2001
calibeebee said:
I always thought this was a huge mistake by Nike. Cutting ties with retail.

And also, not picking a lane has turned a lot of people towards brands that stick to their target audience. ON CLOUD sticks to what they know. Under armor has a specific audience.

Nike can’t decide if it wants to be Jean Paul Gaultier or all inclusive. Just pick one and make it the best.


you mad they make sizes for bigger people? assuming you want the above models to get into the gym and lose weights, they need clothes to wear while doing so correct? Also the top girl isn't even fat.
langfor5
Supporter
6900
5139
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
703 hwy said:
Nike also messed up trying to make everything a variant Kobe model.
Low top. Forefoot zoom. Engineered mesh. reinforced overlays. Rinse and repeat.

The innovation that made Nike ‘Nike’ disappeared a long, long time ago.
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
langfor5 said:
Low top. Forefoot zoom. Engineered mesh. reinforced overlays. Rinse and repeat.

The innovation that made Nike ‘Nike’ disappeared a long, long time ago.

What’s wild is Kobe shoes had a purpose. He played soccer and wanted a lightweight low shoe because of some of the soccer strengths.

Not just Nike but Kobe stan athletes want to copy instead of making their own wave.

One thing about the first 23 or so Jordans, IT SET THE TONE. They didn’t copy they innovated.

Now with more shoes and competition it’s tougher and hey how much can anyone do to a shoe?
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
What’s also funny about all this is the old Nike Basketball shoes worked so well because they worked in your jeans just as they worked on the court.

Today I rarely if ever see any new nike basketball shoes worn with jeans and a fit. They like just for actual basketball lol
13694
12859
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
ALNotSure said:
What’s also funny about all this is the old Nike Basketball shoes worked so well because they worked in your jeans just as they worked on the court.

Today I rarely if ever see any new nike basketball shoes worn with jeans and a fit. They like just for actual basketball lol

That’s mostly because the style shift culturally. Nothing to do with the design of the shoe themselves.
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
biggie62 said:
That’s mostly because the style shift culturally. Nothing to do with the design of the shoe themselves.

I agree on the shift but the designs also stink. Which is why the retros sells better than the new stuff.

You seen the Jordan 39? Brick city lol
13694
12859
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
ALNotSure said:
I agree on the shift but the designs also stink. Which is why the retros sells better than the new stuff.

You seen the Jordan 39? Brick city lol

I mean yea I don’t disagree with the new Jordan’s. But to me Jordan’s died with the 23. That’s the very last one I recognize. I stopped wearing Js in 2009 personally outside of Jordan 1 lows so I go even further.

But I still wear Kobe’s casually as those are the last shoes I wore when I played balled before I had to give it up so it’s nostalgic to me. But outside of that yea I wear AM1s some flyknits and such. Nike designs have gotten lazy but style shifts are a big reason. Nike never really did dad shoes which are in now. But I can’t even get down with that style 🤷‍♂️

Edit: I do wear Pegasus but they are comfortable as hell for walking.
calibeebee
Supporter
19564
25418
Joined
May 6, 2007
datznasty said:
you mad they make sizes for bigger people? assuming you want the above models to get into the gym and lose weights, they need clothes to wear while doing so correct? Also the top girl isn't even fat.

No no. I didn’t mean for this to come off as fat shaming. I just picked the first two pictures that popped up on Nikes website when I clicked on “clothing” tab under women. First one looks like it’s marketed as designer aesthetic, (which is a pretty niche market) and the pink outfit is more all inclusive to traditional gym attire.

In my opinion, it seems like they need to pick an identity and do it well, in order to maintain what made them dominant in the first place.
22089
18578
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Ant Man has one of the few basketball sigs that can worn casually with a fit
23445
47429
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
I like my AE 1's with athletic wear. Nylon or basketball shorts, sweats, trackpants.

I don't like them with denim.
90840
124429
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Don't care for the Dames, Spydas and Traes, but adidas is doing a good job with the Ants and Hardens as far as setting them apart visually. They stand out on the court and really epitomize the players.
733
457
Joined
Nov 8, 2013
Nike’s fallen off. IMO, they’re not worth the premium right now.

They need more meaningful innovation and cultural impact to be more relevant in a time where our attention can see an entire landscape of appealing athletic wear brands and products. That said, they’re always one impactful person or product away from relevance.
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
biggie62 said:
I mean yea I don’t disagree with the new Jordan’s. But to me Jordan’s died with the 23. That’s the very last one I recognize. I stopped wearing Js in 2009 personally outside of Jordan 1 lows so I go even further.

But I still wear Kobe’s casually as those are the last shoes I wore when I played balled before I had to give it up so it’s nostalgic to me. But outside of that yea I wear AM1s some flyknits and such. Nike designs have gotten lazy but style shifts are a big reason. Nike never really did dad shoes which are in now. But I can’t even get down with that style 🤷‍♂️

Edit: I do wear Pegasus but they are comfortable as hell for walking.

Same died after the 23
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
WASHED KING said:
I like my AE 1's with athletic wear. Nylon or basketball shorts, sweats, trackpants.

I don't like them with denim.

Agreed it’s not a jeans shoe. But it’s a fantastic sneaker. And only $120 instead of $220
rbk93
Supporter
13983
13165
Joined
Jun 29, 2016
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
CEO WAS CHEEKS

3145
6781
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
John Donahoe is out?! Thank goodness!
36936
30953
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
LFG!
Air Champa formerly champa
2359
4248
Joined
Feb 23, 2017
Seeing they're on the Jordan 39 now, will there ever be a point where they stop making new Jordans? I stopped at the 17s. Are they still making lots of money for Nike?
33176
12317
Joined
Jul 11, 2006
ALNotSure said:
CEO WAS CHEEKS

1516
4103
Joined
Apr 20, 2022
I’ll hold my breath. Getting a OG is okay but as long he’s not out of touch of what the real modern consumer expects.
21305
12426
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Air Champa said:
Seeing they're on the Jordan 39 now, will there ever be a point where they stop making new Jordans? I stopped at the 17s. Are they still making lots of money for Nike?
Right they really should stop. I doubt they’re breaking even on them 😆
3145
6781
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
TSCQ said:
I’ll hold my breath. Getting a OG is okay but as long he’s not out of touch of what the real modern consumer expects.

Yeah, I'm seeing that Elliott (the new guy stepping in) was really involved with commercial and marketing operations according to the official statement, so it makes me wonder if there is truly gonna be any improvement for product innovation and quality changes itself, but it seems that they may not go towards that direction.
daruma formerly clu713
Supporter
10156
26342
Joined
May 3, 2009
see, bullying works.
13694
12859
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Nike CEO was obviously part of the freak nicks with Diddy.
ALNotSure
Supporter
5017
11544
Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Nike messed up big time…

22089
18578
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
ALNotSure said:
Nike messed up big time…

I'm confused. They never had him before he went to NB
Join the full discussion at the NikeTalk Forum →